dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaAntisocial behavior towards large language model users: experimental evidence
| Authors | Paweł Niszczota, Cassandra Grützner |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | 2601.09772vv1 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09772 |
| License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Abstract
The rapid spread of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about the social reactions they provoke. Prior research documents negative attitudes toward AI users, but it remains unclear whether such disapproval translates into costly action. We address this question in a two-phase online experiment (N = 491 Phase II participants; Phase I provided targets) where participants could spend part of their own endowment to reduce the earnings of peers who had previously completed a real-effort task with or without LLM support. On average, participants destroyed 36% of the earnings of those who relied exclusively on the model, with punishment increasing monotonically with actual LLM use. Disclosure about LLM use created a credibility gap: self-reported null use was punished more harshly than actual null use, suggesting that declarations of "no use" are treated with suspicion. Conversely, at high levels of use, actual reliance on the model was punished more strongly than self-reported reliance. Taken together, these findings provide the first behavioral evidence that the efficiency gains of LLMs come at the cost of social sanctions.
{
"annotation_id": "04c4a104-afbc-415e-8298-f30d564e5789",
"date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:24.043000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:24.043000Z",
"file_hash": "ecd219dca32edfc7711bc5f5f1d37b566a2a5d0abfe38382435df105925197d5",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "The rapid spread of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about the social reactions they provoke. Prior research documents negative attitudes toward AI users, but it remains unclear whether such disapproval translates into costly action. We address this question in a two-phase online experiment (N = 491 Phase II participants; Phase I provided targets) where participants could spend part of their own endowment to reduce the earnings of peers who had previously completed a real-effort task with or without LLM support. On average, participants destroyed 36% of the earnings of those who relied exclusively on the model, with punishment increasing monotonically with actual LLM use. Disclosure about LLM use created a credibility gap: self-reported null use was punished more harshly than actual null use, suggesting that declarations of \"no use\" are treated with suspicion. Conversely, at high levels of use, actual reliance on the model was punished more strongly than self-reported reliance. Taken together, these findings provide the first behavioral evidence that the efficiency gains of LLMs come at the cost of social sanctions.",
"arxiv_id": "2601.09772",
"authors": [
"Pawe\u0142 Niszczota",
"Cassandra Gr\u00fctzner"
],
"categories": [
"cs.AI",
"cs.CL",
"cs.CY",
"econ.GN",
"q-fin.EC"
],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"title": "Antisocial behavior towards large language model users: experimental evidence",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09772",
"version": "v1"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "653a5dba-5ad6-47a7-8248-c7b1130ab827",
"id": "arXiv Dataset",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}