{
  "annotation_id": "5cc4670d-006b-4fa5-9f31-41e622441828",
  "date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:11.959000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:11.959000Z",
  "file_hash": "83b3b22be2e1797f5f817c4f91f8327c2cc4c5666bff63db7f1d902099f6914e",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "We introduce Time Puzzles, a constraint-based date inference task for evaluating iterative temporal reasoning. Each puzzle combines factual temporal anchors with (cross-cultural) calendar relations, admits one or multiple valid solution dates, and is algorithmically generated for controlled, dynamic, and continual evaluation. Across 13 diverse LLMs, Time Puzzles well distinguishes their iterative temporal reasoning capabilities and remains challenging without tools: GPT-5 reaches only 49.3% accuracy and all other models stay below 31%, despite the dataset\u0027s simplicity. Web search consistently yields substantial gains and using code interpreter shows mixed effects, but all models perform much better when constraints are rewritten with explicit dates, revealing a gap in reliable tool use. Overall, Time Puzzles presents a simple, cost-effective diagnostic for tool-augmented iterative temporal reasoning.",
    "arxiv_id": "2601.07148",
    "authors": [
      "Zhengxiang Wang",
      "Zeyu Dong"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "cs.CL",
      "cs.AI"
    ],
    "license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
    "title": "Measuring Iterative Temporal Reasoning with Time Puzzles",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07148",
    "version": "v1"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "18640542-da39-4841-9787-1b7c24ff5fe7",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}