{
  "annotation_id": "92e0d11d-6860-41c2-b6b5-5d7f8aea0e71",
  "date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:24.109000Z",
  "date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:24.109000Z",
  "file_hash": "35b219dba93065d3a488e26429ef8f71425dee9ffb68789b7930e94052d5096f",
  "private": false,
  "record": {
    "abstract": "One of the most public episodes of gatekeeping in modern science was the case of so-called \u0027cold fusion\u0027. At a news conference in 1989 the electrochemists Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons announced that they had found evidence of nuclear fusion in palladium electrodes loaded with deuterium. There was worldwide interest. Many groups sought to reproduce the results, most unsuccessfully. Within months, the prevailing view became strongly negative. The claims of Fleischmann and Pons came to be regarded as disreputable, as well as false. As the Caltech physicist David Goldstein put it, cold fusion became \u0027a pariah field, cast out by the scientific establishment\u0027 (Goldstein 1994). The case would already be interesting for students of gatekeeping if the story had ended at that point. Even more interestingly, however, the field survived and persisted. It has been enjoying a modest renaissance, with recent government funding both in the US and the EU. This piece offers an opinionated introduction to cold fusion as a case study of scientific gatekeeping, discussing both its early and recent history",
    "arxiv_id": "2601.09996",
    "authors": [
      "Jonah F Messinger",
      "Florian Metzler",
      "Huw Price"
    ],
    "categories": [
      "physics.hist-ph"
    ],
    "license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
    "title": "Gatekeeping: a Partial History of Cold Fusion",
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09996",
    "version": "v1"
  },
  "schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
  "source": {
    "execution_id": "116a2dab-db46-4e92-a8bd-f9cde7a14b0f",
    "id": "arXiv Dataset",
    "type": "Model",
    "variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
    "version": "0.1.0"
  },
  "user_id": 1000002
}