dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaA selection principle for 2D steady Euler flows via the vanishing viscosity limit
| Authors | Changfeng Gui, Chunjing Xie, Huan Xu |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | 2601.08647vv1 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08647 |
| License | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ |
Abstract
The 2D Euler system, governing inviscid incompressible flow, admits infinitely many steady solutions. To identify which are physically realizable, we investigate the vanishing viscosity limit of the steady Navier-Stokes system. Here, a steady Euler flow with a slip boundary condition is called a vanishing viscosity limit if it is the $L^\infty_{\textup{loc}}\cap H^1_{\textup{loc}}$ limit of steady Navier-Stokes solutions (it is known that strong boundary layers can persist). We then completely classify the vanishing viscosity limit in specific planar domains. In a bounded connected domain, we show that the only vanishing viscosity limit is the constant-vorticity flow. This result does not require the approximating Navier-Stokes solutions to have nested closed streamlines, an essential assumption in the century-old Prandtl-Batchelor theorem. In a strip where the Navier-Stokes velocity (but not the pressure) is periodic in the strip direction, we show that the only vanishing viscosity limits are constant flow, Couette flow, and Poiseuille flow. The proof of the latter result relies on the former and on a powerful rigidity theorem, which asserts that any non-shear steady Euler flow in a periodic strip must have contractible closed streamlines.
{
"annotation_id": "e0095fdc-07e6-4b3b-8ffc-e48773715517",
"date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:16.284000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:16.284000Z",
"file_hash": "f81e7ba7d8a3d1b8303893ff80d377cdcad91aaeff2445353ebc7949decd9d3d",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "The 2D Euler system, governing inviscid incompressible flow, admits infinitely many steady solutions. To identify which are physically realizable, we investigate the vanishing viscosity limit of the steady Navier-Stokes system. Here, a steady Euler flow with a slip boundary condition is called a vanishing viscosity limit if it is the $L^\\infty_{\\textup{loc}}\\cap H^1_{\\textup{loc}}$ limit of steady Navier-Stokes solutions (it is known that strong boundary layers can persist). We then completely classify the vanishing viscosity limit in specific planar domains.\n In a bounded connected domain, we show that the only vanishing viscosity limit is the constant-vorticity flow. This result does not require the approximating Navier-Stokes solutions to have nested closed streamlines, an essential assumption in the century-old Prandtl-Batchelor theorem. In a strip where the Navier-Stokes velocity (but not the pressure) is periodic in the strip direction, we show that the only vanishing viscosity limits are constant flow, Couette flow, and Poiseuille flow. The proof of the latter result relies on the former and on a powerful rigidity theorem, which asserts that any non-shear steady Euler flow in a periodic strip must have contractible closed streamlines.",
"arxiv_id": "2601.08647",
"authors": [
"Changfeng Gui",
"Chunjing Xie",
"Huan Xu"
],
"categories": [
"math.AP"
],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"title": "A selection principle for 2D steady Euler flows via the vanishing viscosity limit",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.08647",
"version": "v1"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "4c967232-0f49-476e-8a3e-aa2f043d7865",
"id": "arXiv Dataset",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}