dorsal/arxiv
View SchemaTowards Automated Diagnosis of Inherited Arrhythmias: Combined Arrhythmia Classification Using Lead-Aware Spatial Attention Networks
| Authors | Sophie Sigfstead, River Jiang, Brianna Davies, Zachary W. M. Laksman, Julia Cadrin-Tourigny, Rafik Tadros, Habib Khan, Joseph Atallah, Christian Steinberg, Shubhayan Sanatani, Mario Talajic, Rahul Krishnan, Andrew D. Krahn, Christopher C. Cheung |
|---|---|
| Categories | |
| ArXiv ID | 2601.07124vv1 |
| URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07124 |
| License | http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ |
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and long QT syndrome (LQTS) are inherited arrhythmia syndromes associated with sudden cardiac death. Deep learning shows promise for ECG interpretation, but multi-class inherited arrhythmia classification with clinically grounded interpretability remains underdeveloped. Our objective was to develop and validate a lead-aware deep learning framework for multi-class (ARVC vs LQTS vs control) and binary inherited arrhythmia classification, and to determine optimal strategies for integrating ECG foundation models within arrhythmia screening tools. We assembled a 13-center Canadian cohort (645 patients; 1,344 ECGs). We evaluated four ECG foundation models using three transfer learning approaches: linear probing, fine-tuning, and combined strategies. We developed lead-aware spatial attention networks (LASAN) and assessed integration strategies combining LASAN with foundation models. Performance was compared against the established foundation model baselines. Lead-group masking quantified disease-specific lead dependence. Fine-tuning outperformed linear probing and combined strategies across all foundation models (mean macro-AUROC 0.904 vs 0.825). The best lead-aware integrations achieved near-ceiling performance (HuBERT-ECG hybrid: macro-AUROC 0.990; ARVC vs control AUROC 0.999; LQTS vs control AUROC 0.994). Lead masking demonstrated physiologic plausibility: V1-V3 were most critical for ARVC detection (4.54% AUROC reduction), while lateral leads were preferentially important for LQTS (2.60% drop). Lead-aware architectures achieved state-of-the-art performance for inherited arrhythmia classification, outperforming all existing published models on both binary and multi-class tasks while demonstrating clinically aligned lead dependence. These findings support potential utility for automated ECG screening pending validation.
{
"annotation_id": "fe03c82d-7d55-4983-9f84-280810eff869",
"date_created": "2026-02-17T05:53:12.314000Z",
"date_modified": "2026-02-17T05:53:12.314000Z",
"file_hash": "a7f17030151effc6239ddf3900e63f7eb8cb57b05b2d991f318d46115925025f",
"private": false,
"record": {
"abstract": "Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and long QT syndrome (LQTS) are inherited arrhythmia syndromes associated with sudden cardiac death. Deep learning shows promise for ECG interpretation, but multi-class inherited arrhythmia classification with clinically grounded interpretability remains underdeveloped. Our objective was to develop and validate a lead-aware deep learning framework for multi-class (ARVC vs LQTS vs control) and binary inherited arrhythmia classification, and to determine optimal strategies for integrating ECG foundation models within arrhythmia screening tools. We assembled a 13-center Canadian cohort (645 patients; 1,344 ECGs). We evaluated four ECG foundation models using three transfer learning approaches: linear probing, fine-tuning, and combined strategies. We developed lead-aware spatial attention networks (LASAN) and assessed integration strategies combining LASAN with foundation models. Performance was compared against the established foundation model baselines. Lead-group masking quantified disease-specific lead dependence. Fine-tuning outperformed linear probing and combined strategies across all foundation models (mean macro-AUROC 0.904 vs 0.825). The best lead-aware integrations achieved near-ceiling performance (HuBERT-ECG hybrid: macro-AUROC 0.990; ARVC vs control AUROC 0.999; LQTS vs control AUROC 0.994). Lead masking demonstrated physiologic plausibility: V1-V3 were most critical for ARVC detection (4.54% AUROC reduction), while lateral leads were preferentially important for LQTS (2.60% drop). Lead-aware architectures achieved state-of-the-art performance for inherited arrhythmia classification, outperforming all existing published models on both binary and multi-class tasks while demonstrating clinically aligned lead dependence. These findings support potential utility for automated ECG screening pending validation.",
"arxiv_id": "2601.07124",
"authors": [
"Sophie Sigfstead",
"River Jiang",
"Brianna Davies",
"Zachary W. M. Laksman",
"Julia Cadrin-Tourigny",
"Rafik Tadros",
"Habib Khan",
"Joseph Atallah",
"Christian Steinberg",
"Shubhayan Sanatani",
"Mario Talajic",
"Rahul Krishnan",
"Andrew D. Krahn",
"Christopher C. Cheung"
],
"categories": [
"cs.LG"
],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"title": "Towards Automated Diagnosis of Inherited Arrhythmias: Combined Arrhythmia Classification Using Lead-Aware Spatial Attention Networks",
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07124",
"version": "v1"
},
"schema_id": "dorsal/arxiv",
"source": {
"execution_id": "e1386bb6-064f-4524-8768-5bee53ec727c",
"id": "arXiv Dataset",
"type": "Model",
"variant": "snapshot-2026-01-17",
"version": "0.1.0"
},
"user_id": 1000002
}