2601.12419v1.pdf

{
  "file/base": {
    "record": {
      "extension": ".pdf",
      "hash": "3320f6e2dab1b01179317fb36bea99d76e4c6730e368bc83f4478bb5cf2d0b78",
      "media_type": "application/pdf",
      "media_type_prefix": "application",
      "name": "2601.12419v1.pdf",
      "size": 488547
    },
    "source": {
      "execution_id": "c01d5eac-6bf4-49d6-9ed9-83920107ae3f",
      "id": "file/base",
      "type": "Model",
      "version": "1.0.0"
    }
  },
  "file/pdf": {
    "private": false,
    "record": {
      "keywords": [],
      "page_count": 26,
      "producer": "pikepdf 8.15.1",
      "title": "Legal experts disagree with rationale extraction techniques for explaining ECtHR case outcome classification",
      "version": "1.5"
    },
    "source": {
      "execution_id": "a1efd78c-4e22-4635-a6d2-188106e2f985",
      "id": "dorsal/pdf",
      "type": "Model",
      "version": "1.1.0"
    }
  }
}